UK Business Exit Statistics 2026: Sale Rates, Succession & Exit Data

80% of UK SMEs fail to sell. Our analysis of 3.7 million companies reveals exit success rates, succession gaps by sector, and where the real acquisition pipeline sits — 11,068 PURSUE-grade companies.

ExitRadar Research·Published 28 March 2026·14 min read·Statistics refreshed August 2026
% of UK SMEs that try to sell but fail to find a buyer
80%
Over 90% for businesses under £1m turnover
Industry research
Companies with an average director age of 60 or over
841,122
24.0% of companies with a known director age
ExitRadar register
Sole-director companies, 60+, assets over £50k, no successor
172,982
£244.5bn in aggregate assets
ExitRadar register
Companies dissolved in 2024/25
726,735
▲ 9.6% year on year
Companies House
Key findings
  • 841,122 UK companies have an average director age of 60 or above
  • 2,113,320 companies — 60.4% — have a single director with no co-directors, successors, or internal succession infrastructure
  • 458,271 of those single-director companies have a director aged 60+
  • 172,982 sole directors aged 60+ run companies with total assets above £50,000 and no internal successor. Between them, they hold £244.5 billion in aggregate assets
  • 119,404 sole directors are in their 70s, holding £111.7 billion in assets
  • 726,735 UK companies were dissolved in the 2024/25 financial year — the highest number on record and a 9.6% increase on the prior year (Companies House)
  • Only around 20% of businesses listed with a broker complete a sale. For small SMEs, the effective rate is far worse
  • 11,068 companies are PURSUE-grade on our model — a strong business meeting strong exit signals
Exhibit 1
From the register to the succession gap
Each stage is a strict subset of the one above it
Companies remaining after each successive filter, UK active register.
StageCompaniesSurvives from stage aboveShare of base
Active companies with a known director age3,500,020100.0%100.0%
Average director age 60+841,12224.0%24.0%
Sole director, 60+, assets over £50k172,98220.6%4.9%
Source: ExitRadar / Companies House · as of August 2026 — Each stage is a strict subset of the one above it, so the drop-offs are the differences between the published stages. PURSUE-grade is deliberately not shown here: it is scored on business quality and exit timing, so it is not a subset of the 60+ cohort and cannot sit in this flow.

The completion rate problem

The most cited figure in UK business sales is this: roughly 80% of SMEs that try to sell fail to find a buyer.

That number has been consistent for years. Over 90% of small businesses that go to market never complete a sale. Business brokers — the traditional route to market — sell approximately 20% of the businesses they take on, and even that figure is generous. It includes mid-cap transactions where completion rates are significantly higher. For businesses with turnover under £1 million, the effective success rate is far worse.

Yet the "failure to sell" figure only captures businesses that actively tried. It says nothing about the far larger group that never reached the market at all.

Companies House dissolved 726,735 companies in the year to March 2025 (April 2024 to March 2025) — the highest number on record, a 9.6% increase on the prior year. In the same period, 39,841 companies entered liquidation or other insolvency proceedings, an 8.6% increase. Not all of these were trading businesses, and not all closures represent failed exits. But the scale is instructive: hundreds of thousands of companies leave the register every year, and only a tiny fraction pass through a structured sale process first.

The average age of a dissolved company has declined to 4.5 years, suggesting many were never established enough to sell. But within the population of long-established, asset-backed businesses with ageing owners, the picture is different. These companies don't dissolve because they failed. They dissolve because nobody planned for what came next. For company-level dissolution analysis, see our study of why 1,239 profitable UK businesses closed instead of being sold.


Who owns UK businesses

We analysed 3.7 million active UK companies using public data from Companies House. The ownership demographics point to a structural transition that is already underway.

52.9% of UK companies have an average director age of 50 or above — 1,852,722 companies. 24.0% have an average director age of 60 or above — 841,122 companies. 6.0% have an average director age of 70 or above — 210,574 companies.

That one-in-four figure for the 60+ cohort matches the US pattern identified by McKinsey's Institute for Economic Mobility, which found that one in four American small-business owners is now 65 or older. We break down the UK-US comparison in detail in The Great Ownership Transfer.

Exhibit 2
Average director age
Share of active companies by average director age band
Share of active companies by average director age band.
Age bandShareCumulative
Under 5047.1%100.0%
50 to 5928.9%52.9%
60 to 6918.0%24.0%
70 and over6.0%6.0%
Source: ExitRadar / Companies House · as of August 2026 — Bands are the average director age of the board, not the age of any individual director. Shares are over companies where a director age is on file.

But the UK has an additional structural vulnerability: the single-director company. Of 3.7 million active UK companies, 2,113,320 — 60.4% — have just one director. No co-directors. No named successors. No family members on the board. No internal succession infrastructure of any kind.

This is not a behavioural failure. It is a structural one. Nearly two-thirds of UK companies are constitutionally incapable of an internal succession because there is nobody else in the business with legal authority.

The founder-operator pattern is deeply embedded. 296,938 companies have a single director with 15 or more years of continuous tenure — one individual running the business alone for over a decade with no sign of transition planning.


The succession infrastructure gap

When we filter the database to its most acute cohort — sole directors aged 60 or above, total assets above £50,000, and no internal successor — the numbers are stark.

172,982 companies meet all three criteria. They hold £244.5 billion in aggregate assets. These are not marginal businesses. They are established, asset-backed companies with a single point of failure: one person, approaching or past retirement age, with no plan and no successor. For a deeper look at why this matters, see our UK SME Succession Crisis analysis.

Within that group, 119,404 companies have a sole director in their 70s, collectively holding £111.7 billion in assets. For these businesses, succession is not a five-year conversation. It is happening now, whether the owner has planned for it or not.

Widening the lens to sole directors aged 60+ with any positive assets produces 363,293 companies. Within that group, tens of thousands also have 15+ years of director tenure, the classic founder-operator profile where one individual holds all relationships, institutional knowledge, and operational authority.

These are the businesses most likely to close rather than transfer. Not because they lack value, but because no infrastructure exists to connect them with buyers before the window closes.

Exhibit 3
Succession pressure by sector and region
Dot size is companies in the cell; colour is the share with an average director age of 60 or over
Companies and share with an average director age of 60 or over, by sector and region.
SectorRegionCompaniesDirectors 60+
ManufacturingLondon25,04422.6%
ManufacturingSouth East17,98632.8%
ManufacturingEast of England13,04731.6%
ManufacturingSouth West11,98933.5%
ManufacturingWest Midlands15,13231.6%
ManufacturingEast Midlands9,43331.3%
ManufacturingYorkshire & The Humber12,68429.0%
ManufacturingNorth West15,44130.6%
ManufacturingNorth East4,10630.7%
ManufacturingWales5,65531.6%
ManufacturingScotland8,27428.7%
ManufacturingNorthern Ireland3,44527.4%
Construction & TradesLondon92,70017.1%
Construction & TradesSouth East56,09222.7%
Construction & TradesEast of England38,90621.4%
Construction & TradesSouth West32,17724.6%
Construction & TradesWest Midlands28,53021.8%
Construction & TradesEast Midlands21,43020.5%
Construction & TradesYorkshire & The Humber27,32120.5%
Construction & TradesNorth West38,28920.9%
Construction & TradesNorth East10,77019.9%
Construction & TradesWales13,82323.1%
Construction & TradesScotland20,94822.1%
Construction & TradesNorthern Ireland8,35722.2%
HealthcareLondon50,22019.4%
HealthcareSouth East24,54120.6%
HealthcareEast of England15,14518.7%
HealthcareSouth West12,73221.5%
HealthcareWest Midlands16,97216.7%
HealthcareEast Midlands11,64216.0%
HealthcareYorkshire & The Humber14,28316.1%
HealthcareNorth West23,52816.2%
HealthcareNorth East4,57218.3%
HealthcareWales5,94721.6%
HealthcareScotland7,77718.9%
HealthcareNorthern Ireland2,82422.4%
Professional ServicesLondon159,25223.0%
Professional ServicesSouth East79,06533.4%
Professional ServicesEast of England42,73130.8%
Professional ServicesSouth West39,09033.6%
Professional ServicesWest Midlands35,45628.7%
Professional ServicesEast Midlands25,37429.2%
Professional ServicesYorkshire & The Humber31,24527.7%
Professional ServicesNorth West54,16127.1%
Professional ServicesNorth East12,59327.2%
Professional ServicesWales14,57732.4%
Professional ServicesScotland28,34631.0%
Professional ServicesNorthern Ireland6,58925.2%
Facility & Field ServicesLondon19,75515.9%
Facility & Field ServicesSouth East12,05920.1%
Facility & Field ServicesEast of England7,81719.8%
Facility & Field ServicesSouth West6,25422.0%
Facility & Field ServicesWest Midlands6,11919.7%
Facility & Field ServicesEast Midlands4,17019.1%
Facility & Field ServicesYorkshire & The Humber5,40918.5%
Facility & Field ServicesNorth West8,23619.2%
Facility & Field ServicesNorth East1,97320.2%
Facility & Field ServicesWales2,81821.5%
Facility & Field ServicesScotland4,18219.0%
Facility & Field ServicesNorthern Ireland1,07021.0%
IT & Tech ServicesLondon52,38212.3%
IT & Tech ServicesSouth East22,05020.9%
IT & Tech ServicesEast of England10,25620.0%
IT & Tech ServicesSouth West9,11622.3%
IT & Tech ServicesWest Midlands8,33416.6%
IT & Tech ServicesEast Midlands5,44519.4%
IT & Tech ServicesYorkshire & The Humber6,35817.1%
IT & Tech ServicesNorth West11,65015.7%
IT & Tech ServicesNorth East2,02016.7%
IT & Tech ServicesWales2,71120.7%
IT & Tech ServicesScotland4,67419.8%
IT & Tech ServicesNorthern Ireland1,20916.7%
TechnologyLondon32,83512.8%
TechnologySouth East12,23422.1%
TechnologyEast of England6,27320.5%
TechnologySouth West6,03421.2%
TechnologyWest Midlands5,14516.8%
TechnologyEast Midlands3,29518.1%
TechnologyYorkshire & The Humber4,39517.1%
TechnologyNorth West8,06016.0%
TechnologyNorth East1,63617.1%
TechnologyWales2,06221.9%
TechnologyScotland3,35819.4%
TechnologyNorthern Ireland1,11915.7%
AutomotiveLondon11,63715.8%
AutomotiveSouth East9,50422.3%
AutomotiveEast of England6,84621.0%
AutomotiveSouth West5,79424.0%
AutomotiveWest Midlands7,53417.7%
AutomotiveEast Midlands5,15219.2%
AutomotiveYorkshire & The Humber6,58518.1%
AutomotiveNorth West8,32920.5%
AutomotiveNorth East2,09722.8%
AutomotiveWales2,79224.7%
AutomotiveScotland3,70623.1%
AutomotiveNorthern Ireland1,59619.1%
Logistics & Fleet ServicesLondon16,97715.3%
Logistics & Fleet ServicesSouth East9,85220.5%
Logistics & Fleet ServicesEast of England8,61419.3%
Logistics & Fleet ServicesSouth West4,84124.3%
Logistics & Fleet ServicesWest Midlands9,38114.6%
Logistics & Fleet ServicesEast Midlands6,80314.5%
Logistics & Fleet ServicesYorkshire & The Humber6,93818.3%
Logistics & Fleet ServicesNorth West8,81020.1%
Logistics & Fleet ServicesNorth East1,76724.9%
Logistics & Fleet ServicesWales2,33125.3%
Logistics & Fleet ServicesScotland3,53824.2%
Logistics & Fleet ServicesNorthern Ireland1,58920.3%
Wholesale & DistributionLondon24,96618.6%
Wholesale & DistributionSouth East7,78029.8%
Wholesale & DistributionEast of England5,38928.9%
Wholesale & DistributionSouth West4,08132.0%
Wholesale & DistributionWest Midlands6,70223.5%
Wholesale & DistributionEast Midlands3,71227.7%
Wholesale & DistributionYorkshire & The Humber4,92923.0%
Wholesale & DistributionNorth West8,76423.7%
Wholesale & DistributionNorth East1,31227.9%
Wholesale & DistributionWales1,84731.6%
Wholesale & DistributionScotland2,85626.2%
Wholesale & DistributionNorthern Ireland1,71225.0%
Financial ServicesLondon42,59022.8%
Financial ServicesSouth East15,69228.6%
Financial ServicesEast of England10,05327.2%
Financial ServicesSouth West9,02727.2%
Financial ServicesWest Midlands9,30725.6%
Financial ServicesEast Midlands6,60125.3%
Financial ServicesYorkshire & The Humber8,15023.4%
Financial ServicesNorth West12,65422.7%
Financial ServicesNorth East2,68525.2%
Financial ServicesWales3,67325.4%
Financial ServicesScotland5,40126.8%
Financial ServicesNorthern Ireland2,30825.5%
Education & TrainingLondon28,33017.1%
Education & TrainingSouth East10,71225.3%
Education & TrainingEast of England6,42321.6%
Education & TrainingSouth West5,85727.9%
Education & TrainingWest Midlands6,38419.9%
Education & TrainingEast Midlands4,04921.5%
Education & TrainingYorkshire & The Humber5,09121.5%
Education & TrainingNorth West8,47119.4%
Education & TrainingNorth East2,08724.3%
Education & TrainingWales2,61825.5%
Education & TrainingScotland3,33423.5%
Education & TrainingNorthern Ireland97026.4%
Hospitality & LeisureLondon113,40317.4%
Hospitality & LeisureSouth East49,29322.2%
Hospitality & LeisureEast of England30,26920.7%
Hospitality & LeisureSouth West30,42324.6%
Hospitality & LeisureWest Midlands28,44418.1%
Hospitality & LeisureEast Midlands19,21719.2%
Hospitality & LeisureYorkshire & The Humber26,95019.0%
Hospitality & LeisureNorth West42,05218.0%
Hospitality & LeisureNorth East11,44019.0%
Hospitality & LeisureWales14,85423.2%
Hospitality & LeisureScotland26,53921.3%
Hospitality & LeisureNorthern Ireland6,77220.2%
RetailLondon66,93311.6%
RetailSouth East24,23120.3%
RetailEast of England15,93919.0%
RetailSouth West14,12523.7%
RetailWest Midlands18,57215.5%
RetailEast Midlands11,13317.4%
RetailYorkshire & The Humber15,62716.3%
RetailNorth West25,05515.2%
RetailNorth East5,15318.0%
RetailWales6,38122.1%
RetailScotland11,15819.5%
RetailNorthern Ireland4,25418.1%
Source: ExitRadar / Companies House · as of August 2026 · classifier ac-v1 — Share is over companies in the cell where a director age is on file. Sector is model-derived, so a reclassification can move companies between cells without anything changing in the world — the classifier version above is what distinguishes the two.

The five exit routes

UK business owners have five main exit routes. None works well for the majority of small SMEs.

Trade sale

The default assumption, and the route most owners name first. A buyer in the same or adjacent sector acquires the business, usually through a broker. It works poorly for small SMEs: slow processes, high information asymmetry, and a buyer pool that thins sharply below £1m turnover.

Completion rate
~20%
of businesses listed with a broker, across all deal sizes
Industry research

Management buyout

Theoretically attractive and widely contemplated, but it requires two things many small businesses lack: a management team capable of running the business without the founder, and access to acquisition finance. In an owner-run company the management often IS the owner.

Consideration rate
95%
of SME owners surveyed say they have considered a buyout, not completed one
Survey

Employee ownership trust

Grew rapidly after the Finance Act 2014 introduced a full CGT exemption on qualifying sales. The appeal narrowed in November 2025 when that exemption was halved, and EOTs suit businesses with an established team and strong cash flow rather than a single-director company.

Effective tax rate
~12%
capital gains tax on a qualifying disposal after November 2025
HMRC rules

Family transfer

Emotionally the default expectation and statistically the exception. Only around 35% of UK small firms have a formal exit or succession strategy at all, and inter-generational transfer has a poor completion record even among those that do.

Survival rate
30%
of family businesses that attempt a transfer reach a second generation
Industry research

Closure

Not a decision so much as what happens when the other four do not. The owner retires, falls ill, or runs out of energy; employees find other jobs and customers move on. For an asset-backed company with an ageing sole director, this is the modal outcome.

Annual count
726,735
companies dissolved in 2024/25
Companies House

The broker bottleneck

Business brokers are the traditional intermediary, but the economics are strained.

There are over 1,000 firms in the UK that sell businesses. The industry is unregulated, unlicensed, and highly variable in quality. Completion rates across the industry sit around 20%, and that figure flatters the larger corporate finance houses. For small business brokers handling sub-£1 million transactions, the effective success rate is lower.

Several structural problems contribute.

Misaligned incentives. Many brokers take on businesses they know will be difficult to sell, collecting upfront listing fees or retainers while doing minimal active marketing. Some firms carry 15–20 mandates simultaneously without completing a single transaction in over a year.

Valuation inflation. Unrealistic seller expectations are consistently cited as the single biggest barrier to completion — over half of failed sales are attributed to this factor. Yet brokers frequently inflate valuations to win mandates, creating a disconnect between expectation and market reality that only becomes apparent months into the process.

Confidentiality failure. Maintaining discretion during a sale is critical — employees, customers, and suppliers can react badly to news that a business is on the market. Yet confidentiality is routinely breached through careless marketing, identifiable listing descriptions, or simply disclosing the company name in correspondence.

Volume over specialisation. Most brokers take on businesses across all sectors and sizes. This generalist approach means individual businesses receive limited attention, and the broker lacks the sector expertise to identify the right buyer pool.

For brokers looking to build pipeline from this data, see our guide to data-led mandate sourcing.


The hidden market

The broker model only captures businesses where the owner has consciously decided to sell, engaged an intermediary, and entered the market. This represents a small fraction of the total exit pipeline.

The far larger opportunity sits in businesses showing clear succession signals but not yet listed — what McKinsey calls the "missing middle" and what our data quantifies at company level. We explored this concept in depth in The Great Ownership Transfer.

When we score UK companies for exit readiness — combining director age, tenure, filing patterns, investment behaviour, dividend activity, and board structure — and keep only those that are also genuinely good businesses, we find 11,068 PURSUE-grade companies. For the full methodology behind these scores, see How We Identify Exit-Ready UK Businesses.

These are viable, often profitable businesses. The sectors where they cluster are not distressed industries — they are the productive core of the UK economy.

Exhibit 4
Where the pipeline is thickest
PURSUE-grade companies by sector, absolute and per 10,000 companies in the sector
PURSUE-grade companies by sector, absolute and per 10,000 companies in sector.
SectorPURSUE-gradeSector totalPer 10,000
Construction & Trades1,681389,51043.2
Professional Services1,264528,79923.9
Manufacturing1,230142,31786.4
Healthcare1,021190,28153.7
These four sectors account for 5,196 of the 11,068 PURSUE-grade companies.
Source: ExitRadar / Companies House · as of August 2026 · classifier ac-v1 — Per-10,000 rates are computed from the two published columns. Raw count and concentration rank the sectors differently — the largest population is not the densest pipeline.

Among the sectors we track in detail, Construction has the largest PURSUE pipeline: 1,681 companies where a strong business meets strong exit signals, drawn from a total population of 389,510. B2B services follows with 1,264 from 528,799. Manufacturing has 1,230 from 142,317 — and stands out on two other measures: the longest average director tenure of the headline sectors (10.3 years vs the 8.5-year national baseline) and among the highest median assets (£92,744 vs £45,736 nationally), making it the sector where individual targets tend to be most financially substantial. Healthcare rounds out the leaders with 1,021 from 190,281.

Exhibit 5
Ideal-target profile by sector
Single director aged 60–70, 15 or more years of tenure, assets above £50,000
Companies matching the ideal-target profile, by sector.
SectorCompanies
Professional Services8,238
Construction & Trades7,663
Manufacturing3,566
Healthcare2,200
Technology835
Education & Training595
23,097 companies across the six sectors shown.
Source: ExitRadar / Companies House · as of August 2026 · classifier ac-v1 — The age filter is the 60–70 bracket, so owners aged 70 and over are not counted here — these figures are a floor, not a ceiling, on the pre-market population.

A broader "ideal target" count — companies with a single director aged 60–70, tenure of 15+ years, and assets above £50,000 — captures the pre-market vendors a searcher might approach before they list. B2B services: 8,238. Construction: 7,663. Manufacturing: 3,566. Tech services: 835. Healthcare: 2,200. Education: 595.

Beyond these headline sectors, ExitRadar publishes detailed exit-trend analyses for IT services, transport & logistics, wholesale & distribution, automotive, food & beverage manufacturing, and facility services — each with sector-specific demographic, financial, and succession-signal benchmarks.

Exhibit 6
PURSUE-grade companies by region
Ranked by count, and by concentration per 10,000 companies in the region
PURSUE-grade companies by region, absolute and per 10,000 companies in the region.
RegionPURSUE-gradeCompanies in regionPer 10,000
London2,0911,104,59418.9
South East1,493501,66929.8
North West1,234380,53032.4
East of England1,022305,85033.4
South West1,019277,93436.7
West Midlands886280,50531.6
Yorkshire & The Humber852241,14135.3
Scotland702184,99137.9
East Midlands658187,64135.1
Wales445114,51838.9
North East37188,15642.1
Northern Ireland29262,38246.8
Source: ExitRadar / Companies House · as of August 2026 · classifier ac-v1 — Region is not a scoring input, so PURSUE may be cut by region without the circularity that rules it out of any chart against owner age. Counts exclude companies that have not passed the target gate.

PURSUE-grade companies are not evenly distributed. London and the South East consistently produce the highest counts across every sector. But rates — the share of a region's companies that are PURSUE-grade — tell a different story: the densest regions by rate aren't always the largest by count, and several rural and northern regions punch above their weight per capita.

These regional patterns matter for buyers. A searcher targeting a specific sector in a less-worked region often finds materially less competition per viable target than in London. Our Regional Map of Succession Opportunity breaks down the PURSUE pipeline by region, showing where buyers should focus.

These businesses are not listed on any marketplace. Most of their owners have not consciously decided to sell. But the data shows they match every profile of a company approaching a natural exit window. The owner is ageing. Investment has slowed. Filing engagement is declining. No successor is in place.

The gap is not a shortage of businesses or a shortage of buyers. It is a shortage of infrastructure to connect them.


The tax clock

Tax policy is compounding the demographic pressure.

Business Asset Disposal Relief (BADR) — formerly Entrepreneurs' Relief — provides a reduced CGT rate on qualifying business disposals, up to a lifetime limit of £1 million. The rate has risen sharply: 10% before April 2025, 14% for the 2025/26 tax year, and 18% from 6 April 2026. For the full impact analysis, see our BADR Rate Rise breakdown.

Exhibit 7
Business Asset Disposal Relief, effective rate
Rate applying to a qualifying gain, by disposal date
BADR rate and tax due on a £1 million qualifying gain, by period.
PeriodBADR rateTax on £1m gain
Before April 202510%£100,000
2025/2614%£140,000
From 6 April 202618%£180,000
A £80,000 swing between the old rate and the incoming one.
Source: HMRC published rates — Illustrative tax figures assume the full gain qualifies for relief and the lifetime limit is unused.

For a business owner selling £1 million of qualifying gains, the difference between the old 10% rate and the incoming 18% rate is £80,000 in additional tax. For a £2 million exit — £1 million qualifying for BADR, the remainder taxed at the main CGT rate — the total bill rises from £300,000 two years ago, when BADR was 10% and the main rate 20%, to £420,000 from April 2026. That is £120,000 more, on the same sale. Two separate changes are compounding here. BADR itself nearly doubled, costing £80,000 on the first £1 million. The main CGT rate rose from 20% to 24% at the same time, costing a further £40,000 on the second. And because the BADR lifetime limit is fixed at £1 million, the relief covers a shrinking share of the gain as the business gets bigger: on a £5 million exit the same two changes add £240,000, of which the main-rate rise — not BADR — accounts for two thirds.

The direction of travel is clear. Some commentators expect further increases. Owners who delay exit face progressively higher tax costs — creating urgency for those who are already approaching natural retirement age.

Inheritance tax changes add further pressure. From April 2026, Business Property Relief and Agricultural Property Relief are capped, meaning more business assets fall within the inheritance tax net. Owners who intended to pass businesses to family members through their estate now face a materially worse tax outcome than even twelve months ago.

The combined effect — rising CGT on disposal, reduced IHT relief on retention — narrows the window for tax-efficient exits from both directions.


The demographic pipeline

The succession pressure visible today is the leading edge of a much larger wave.

The 50–60 age bracket in our database contains 1,011,600 companies — more than a million businesses whose directors will age into the 60+ cohort over the next decade. Behind them, 996,119 companies sit in the 40–50 bracket. The pipeline of future succession pressure extends decades into the future.

At the sharp end, the numbers are more immediate. The 841,122 companies with an average director age of 60+ today will not all exit within five years. But a significant proportion will. Health events, retirement decisions, tax pressure, and simple fatigue will push tens of thousands of owners toward exit — ready or not.

Among those with the clearest exit signals — sole directors in their 70s with established businesses and no internal successor — the transition is already happening. The question is whether it happens through an orderly transfer that preserves jobs and value, or through a quiet closure that destroys both.


What this means for buyers

For search fund operators, ETA practitioners, and strategic acquirers, the UK exit pipeline represents a large and growing opportunity — but one that requires a fundamentally different approach to sourcing. We mapped the full UK ETA Ecosystem — investors, lenders, advisers, and the 11,068 PURSUE-grade targets they are all competing for.

The businesses most likely to be available are not listed on any marketplace. They are identified through data, not deal flow. The owners are receptive to the right conversation but hostile to transactional approaches. The competitive dynamics are different from brokered deals: fewer buyers competing, but higher barriers to making initial contact.

Our scoring model identifies 11,068 PURSUE-grade companies — a strong business meeting strong exit signals. Construction, B2B services and manufacturing carry the largest PURSUE pipelines, and healthcare is close behind — all four align closely with typical search fund and ETA acquisition criteria.

The sector totals above are cut by industry code, which is where a specialist trade can disappear: cooling and refrigeration has no code of its own and is filed inside plumbing. The Cold Trade finds those companies by name instead and takes one trade apart in full — profits, workforce, ownership, owner age and what is actually buyable.

The opportunity is large. The infrastructure to access it is what has been missing.


Sources and methodology

This analysis draws on three categories of data.

ExitRadar's proprietary database covers 3.7 million active UK companies, derived from Companies House bulk data products (company profiles, officer appointments, accounts filings, PSC data) published under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Director ages are based on month/year of birth as filed at Companies House. Financial figures are drawn from the most recently filed accounts. Exit readiness scores are generated by ExitRadar's scoring model, which combines director demographics, filing behaviour, investment patterns, and financial health into a composite measure of succession timing and business quality. Full methodology: How We Identify Exit-Ready UK Businesses.

Companies House official statistics provide register-level data on incorporations, dissolutions, and insolvency proceedings. Dissolution and insolvency figures cited are from Companies register activities: statistical release 2024 to 2025 (published June 2025) and Company insolvency statistics December 2025 (published January 2026).

Published research includes the McKinsey Institute for Economic Mobility report "The Great Ownership Transfer" (February 2026), Federation of Small Businesses survey data on exit planning, and industry research on broker completion rates and seller confidence. All sources are cited in context.

Enterprise value — which includes earnings multiples and goodwill — would be significantly higher than the balance sheet figures cited in this article. Net asset figures from filed accounts represent a floor, not a ceiling, on business value.

This article is updated regularly as new data becomes available. Figures last refreshed August 2026.


About ExitRadar: ExitRadar analyses public UK company data to identify businesses showing succession and exit signals 2–5 years before they reach brokers. Our intelligence briefs provide pre-approach analysis for search fund operators, business brokers, and prospective acquirers. Browse exit-ready companies by sector at exitradar.co.uk/sectors, or see what a full intelligence brief includes with our permanently free sample report.